Even then, Stingemore wasn’t able to fit in the furthest reaches of the tube system: the Bakerloo, Metropolitan and District lines are all cut off at the edges of the map. It showed outlying stations such as Edgware and Richmond appearing to be only a short distance from the centre of town, promoting a sense of community between inner London and the suburbs. Not only was the new map neater, it arguably had a social function. The result was a map that no longer represented the true shape of London - and thus couldn’t be superimposed on a street map, as earlier attempts had been - but did allow more stations to be represented with larger text: The 1926 tube map In 1926, a map-maker named Fred Stingemore set out to improve matters by regularising the spacing between stations, and allowing himself some artistic licence with the routes of the various lines. ![]() The map also omitted stations further out from the centre, for reasons which become obvious when you look at a later map that tried to show more of the network:Īs you 'zoom out' from the centre of London, you end up with a huge amount of wasted space toward the edges, and an illegible crush in the middle. Station names had to be written in small text, often at odd angles so they could be crammed in between awkwardly twisting lines. The map showed all the important central stations (including several that have since closed down or changed names), but it didn’t make it easy to find your way around.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |